Sunday, July 31, 2005

America's First Matriarchy: The Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Nation) Part I.

I spend a lot of time thinking about the matriarchy of antiquity and how to prove its existence, or rather, assemble the proof in a fresh form, that I forget to talk about other matriarchies. For those of you who have trouble picturing a matriarchal culture, it's important for you to know that one existed in America for hundreds, if not thousands of years. The Haudenosaunee, more commonly known as the Iroquois Conferderation, was -- and in some places still is -- a matriarchal system. I'm going to write a series of posts based on book Sisters In Spirit, Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Influence on Early American Feminists by Sally Roesch Wagner that will look at the structure and function of a working matriarchal system.



Let’s start by defining our terms. There are many ways to describe this type of society. It can be called matrilineal, meaning that inheritance pass from mother to child. It It can be matrifocal, with an emphasis on motherhood and mother-kinship. It can be ordered around the mother’s family, especially her sisters, where spouses are brought in from other clans, and that can be called matrilocal. I use the term matriarchy to describe a form of government where women are the center of culture. It doesn’t mean that women dominate men, or rule over them. That’s the stuff of men’s nightmares and science fiction. It is sometimes also referred to as gynarchy, but my preferred form is the former option. In the case of the Haudenosaunee, the culture was a matrifocal, matrilocal, matrilineal, matriarchy. There was no rape; no domestic violence; women chose the chiefs, worked together on agriculture, and were equal in every way to the men in their tribes. I’ll get into that later.


First we have to establish that if you are not Native American and don’t live on or near a reservation, most of what you know about the First Nations people is wrong. We all grew up watching westerns where Natives were either “noble savages” or just plain savages. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy lived in peace and made decisions by consensus. They were not conquered through the supremacy of the white man. They were conquered through genocide, disease, and the entitlement Europeans felt to enslave, exploit, murder and steal to enrich themselves, their churches and their monarchs. To understand the culture, you’re going to have to overcome any of the white supremacist attitude that may have worked its way into your conscious and/or subconscious mind. Please don’t overreact to that assertion. We live in a culture that defines “normalcy” as being white, male, of European origin and wealthy. Anything else is “other” - female, brown, red, yellow, black, poor, uneducated, savage, inferior, coarse, common but not “normal”. Even the most enlightened among us will usually have aspects of this attitude deeply ingrained in our thinking, as we’ll see in the author’s case in Part II. For now, open your mind to new information, your ears to hear my words rather than your own assumptions, and your eyes to a picture that hasn’t been shown in the movies.

End of Part I



6 Comments:

At 3:17 PM, Blogger Athana said...

I'm ready and open. Bring on part 2!

 
At 3:29 PM, Blogger Athana said...

How'd you get the picture of the book on your site? I love it. Where do I go on Amazon to do that?

 
At 11:06 PM, Blogger Lisa said...

Actually, I didn't buy into any of that Laura Ingalls, John Wayne, "injun" picture of indigenous peoples on this continent even when I was very small, but I guess that's because of the culture I come from...

 
At 9:22 PM, Blogger Athana said...

Lisa, I remember you said your grandfather was Polish. How does that tie in with your not buying into the Hollywood version of Indians/Native Americans? Or are you also part Native American, perhaps?

 
At 10:32 PM, Blogger Lisa said...

I'm ethnically Slavic and Tartar, both my parents are actually from Poland themselves. I just meant that I never bought any of that Hollywood bullshit. I mean, no pale-skinned families on TV were ever bilingual like mine, with weird foods and folk costumes, and that whole "All-American" and "White" thing looked nothing like the urban poverty I grew up in... And my culture is just so critical of anything that is "told" from anyone with money, lol. TV is all propaganda controlled by The Government to perpetuate a Nation Myth, lol, that's been drummed in from birth, probably in utero.

 
At 7:36 PM, Blogger Struggle For Justice said...

I do not envision world matriarchy as asystem where males are necessarily dominated or debased, but when women rule it will be with compassion and great enlightenment. The main goal of women rulers will be the elimination of hunger and violence in the world. Contrary to the social condition under the present patriarchal system where there is widespread suffering owing to the greed and lust for power which consumes so many male led societies, matriarchs will not tolerate such conditions and I believe they will stop greedy and brutal oppressors, possibly even debilitating them if they insist on causing suffering. The most enlightened and compassionate women should be the supreme leaders without totally excluding men from leadership roles because there still are men who believe in compassionate rule. Presently many underprivileged people are denied the opportunity to educate themselves, thus improving their lives because of the massive waste of resources as patriarchs like G. W. Bush and L. B. Johnson have been so determined to solve international issues by waging senseless wars.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home