Monday, May 23, 2005

Left, yes, bur not necessarily Secular...

Sticks and Stones and the "Secular Left"

In the article linked above, David Benjamin discusses the takeover of the Republican Party by the "Religious Right" and their tendency to label everyone on the left as "secular". He makes some excellent points, but offers no solutions. I'm going to see if I can't develop a little strategic opposition to the advancing theocratic movement.

George Lakoff is the go-to guy for this, obviously, but I'm still not seeing "our side" using talking points and framing as effectively as the Right. We've got to get on with it, before a Christian Autocracy silences its opposition for good.

The first phrase we need to learn comes from Benjamin's article: Christianism should be used to distinguish between Christianity, or the teachings of Christ, and the conservative political machine that promotes it's fascist, elitist, pro-corporation agenda under the guise of religiosity. It's painfully obvious that their agenda has nothing to do with the values or teachings of Jesus. The Prince of Peace would hardly be on the side of war for profit and the "divine right of capital".

Next, we have to call them what they really are: the Conservative Elite. The Left is comprised of many, varied groups. Certainly there are professors and scientists among us, but there are also laborers, Ministers, Jews, Pagans, Buddhists, Islamists, Christians, women, gays, straights, Blacks, Hispanics, Natives and immigrants, with a sprinkling of Hollywood-types who naturally get most of the press but are hardly the majority in our number. Most of the money in this country is controlled by the Right. They are far more likely to have an Ivy League education and a lot of their money is older than the Republic itself. Don't buy into the bullshit that G.W. Bush is a "regular guy". The Bush family is as elite as it gets, and their money old enough to have come mostly from Hitler's own coffers.

The best available estimates are that 100,000 Iraqi citizens have been killed since the U.S. invasion. Let's add to that the tens of thousands who died in Afghanistan, and the millions slaughtered in Darfur without our intervention because we're occupied elsewhere. Then there are the 1600 or so of our bravest young men and women who have died for Halliburton's bottom line. Let's look at the fact that Bush executed more prisoners than any governor in history, and without proper review of the cases. Why the hell are we letting them get away with calling it a "culture of life"? Bush's Slaughter of the Innocents is more like it, when you consider many on Texas' death row were just that, as were the women and children in Iraq and Afghanistan. We're killing people every day who never harmed an American. We've become a Culture of Death

The Conservatives are not "pro-life" - they would allow a sick woman to die in labor to protect a fetus; they have executed the wrong people; they stand in the way of science that could save the lives and alleviate suffering for millions of people. There's no expression of concern or empathy for suffering in them. Their primary motivation seems to be the punishment of women who have sex outside of marriage, though not all who might seek to terminate a pregnancy are single. While they claim to defend the life of the fetus, their real agenda is to control women's sexuality. The salient point that rarely gets a headline is that Women are People, Not Property.

Before we even consider the concept of a Slave Birth, why don't we try taking care of the kids we already have? There are three million homeless kids in this country right now. An unwanted child is more likely to suffer abuse, neglect and poverty, and Freaknomics: A Rogue Economist Explores The Hidden Side of Everything, by Steve D. Levitt and Stephen J Dubner, showed that the drop in the crime rate corresponds to the legalization of abortion. Society benefits when its children are loved and wanted.

How about we make our own label? Pro-Constitutionists has a nice ring to it, as do Liberal Patriots and Jeffersonians. The Pro-American, Pro-Democracy Left needs to stand up and point out that the Subversives on the Radical Right are undermining America's foundations, endangering her people and ruining our reputation in the world.

We used to be the good guys. We were the champions of human rights and civil liberties. We were all about fairness and innovation and creativity. Now our image around the world will forever be associated with the horrors of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. "Cowboy Diplomacy" is the derrogatory term others use to describe our foreign policy. American elections, which used to be a beacon of hope in the world, are now a laughing stock. Do we really want greed, incompetence and callous disregard for life to be the American Legacy in the 21st Century?

Every generation has its Prophets of Doom. Instead of standing on a street corner with a sign that says "the end is near", they are sitting in the White House and the Pentagon, trying to make sure all the players are in place for Armaggedon. Personally, I'd prefer to have people in charge who are motivated to prevent the end of the world rather than hasten it.

I feel like a broken record. I write the same things on different days in different ways, but its all the same. The news is all bad and we need a majority to make a difference, but we'll never get one when elections are stolen from us. How do we reach people who don't read at all, let alone read blogs? How do you educate a person who scoffs at the educated? How do you condense American History to a soundbite so people will remember it? I'm watching my country become a fascist state, and I feel powerless to stop it.

The irony of it all is that the Left is pro-religion. We're loving, tolerant people. We love freedom, humanity and truth. There are a few among us who don't practice a religion, and that's OK with us, too. We're easy to get along with, and that's part of the problem. We want to be reasonable, but we're dealing with people who abhor rational thought. We've been trying to get along while they've been taking over. If we're ever going to fight back, now is the time. Learn these terms and use them. Come up with more and leave them in comments. Spread them around.

  • Christian Autocracy

  • Christianism

  • Bush's Slaughter of the Innocents

  • Women are People, Not Property

  • Conservative Elite

  • Culture of Death

  • Prophets of Doom

  • Slave Birth



10 Comments:

At 10:31 AM, Blogger Palmer said...

Why do you fall for the Right's ploy of equating secularism with evil? As if secularism were a disease like leprosy or some such thing. A secular government is a good thing. We on the Left should be proud to be secularists, proud that the US gov't hasn't declared a national religion and persecuted people of different faiths/non-believers. In the West, secularists have been hammering at Christianity since the Enlightenment so as to prevent another St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre, to make sure another Torquemada does not come to your door being all inquisitive...having a secular government is not just about freedom of conscience, it's about learning the lessons of a past filled with bitter religious disputes that left millions dead. The men who wrote our Constitution knew all too well of the wars between Catholics and Protestants. Promoting a secular government and religious tolerance simultaneously is not contradictory.

I read this and it felt to me that you were kowtowing to Christians who say they're being persecuted because there's no prayer in public schools, etc. And this saddened me. Most, if not all, of the things that the Left hopes to accomplish have nothing to do with religion. It's disheartening to see some on the Left waving a bible around saying, "I'm a Christian too!" when promoting ideas and policies that don't need a religious justificiation. Religion does not own the concept of fairness or of equality. These are moral concepts that do not require a belief in the existence of a deity for them to have potency, rightness, or goodness.

 
At 7:47 AM, Blogger Morgaine said...

Hi, Palmer-

I'm not falling for it, I'm objecting to it. The reality is that one can be devoutly religious and still believe in secular government, as I am and I do. The problem is that we have a lot of good people in this country supporting policies that are in conflict with their beliefs because they believe the hype and don't look any deeper.

I think we have to make a concerted effort to show that the radicals on the Right are not the best representatives of people who practice Christianity. They're a fascist cult that really cares about nothing but power and money. We've let them carry the banner of faith when what they're really about is exploiting gullibility.

Secularism has historically been the mark of an evolved society, in my opinion. No one wants to stop the spread of Christianism than I do. We can't let them drag us back to the 19th century. I'm just trying to get a buzz going with some talking points that tell it like it is, not like they want to sell it.

Peace-

 
At 5:14 PM, Blogger Palmer said...

OK, you lost me. You site the article in which the author notes the tendency of certain folks on the Right to label everyone on the Left as "secular". Is the title here some bit of post-modern irony which I don't understand? "Left, yes, but NOT necessarily Secular" (emphasis mine)

"We were the champions of human rights and civil liberties." Sure by "we" you don't refer to Dems. As in all those Southern Democrats...? How about Republicans who voted in favor of HR 7152 back in 1964? And Dirksen who ended the filibuster to get the Civil Rights Act passed? The Act could never have been passed had it not been for a majority of Republicans. As of 1964: "In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80% of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96% of the votes."

And this atheist wants to extend thanks to your pro-religion Left for tolerating me. Those nasty people who promote Christianism on the Right abhor reason. Please tell me how the fairy tale religions of the Left are anymore rational. Religion is by definition irrational. Christians on the Right and Left believe in the same deity. And both sides do so by abandoning reason.

 
At 1:38 AM, Blogger Morgaine said...

You seem to be missing the sarcasm in parts of the post. We most certainly DON'T all worship the same deity. As to whether religion is all based on fantasy - I guess it depends on which religion you are talking about. My religion has no conflict with science, though many of the conclusions I draw differ from the consensus view taught in most schools, which I believe to have been skewed to promote patriarchal religion and government. I haven't "abandoned reason" at all, though I do occasionally take a bit of poetic license in describing my world view.

The whole point is that believing in secular government does not equal not being "religious". The many civil rights activists were and are actively religious.

The comment about "my pro-religion left tolerating you" is overly defensive. I defend your right to believe in nothing as actively as I defend my right to believe in my Goddess. That's the whole point.

And, no, I'm not speaking specifically about Democrats, I'm speaking of "The Left" in very general terms, as did the author of the article that inspired the post.

 
At 1:01 PM, Blogger Kelley Bell said...

If you want a scary example of religious persecution, please check out the link on my blog.

A judge in Indiana has ruled that a set of Wiccan parents are not permitted to practice their religion in front of their child.

It's insane!

 
At 2:10 PM, Blogger Palmer said...

Have you heard about this crap>

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050527/ap_on_re_us/wiccans_divorce_order_1

 
At 2:19 PM, Blogger Palmer said...

My point was that the Left shouldn't be "pro-religion". It should be pro-secular and neutral on religion.

And please substitute the > with a ? above. It's good see a local, Selena Fox, mentioned.

Take care

 
At 11:06 PM, Blogger Pecos Blue said...

What I have not seen people addressing is how to mend this split--people are talking about it so much that the public masses are believing that all members of the left are non-religious and amorale-- this is fear tactics again by the right and should be called what it is. What happend to the facts--why do people believe fear over everything else.

 
At 12:24 AM, Blogger Morgaine said...

People believe fear over anything else because it appeals to the pre-rational, reptilian part of the brain and then precludes rational thought. Read my article How to talk to a Christian for more info on this.

Ideally, yes, the Left would be neutral on religion, welcoming all stripes of belief or lack thereof. We are in a political climate, however, where the majority party is convincing people that the Left is anti-religion, and that is hurting us.

The fact that there are some very vocal non-believers who are openly disdainful of any religion at all gives them proof that they use to paint us all with the same brush. We need to be very mindful of the fact that our strength lies in inclusiveness and plurality. The Radical Right preys on people's fears, so we have to make them comfortable enough to get out of their reptile brain and into their forebrains.

It's a simple matter of "divide and conquer" - the hate-mongers on the Right try to separate us from each other. Believers and non-believers, gays and straights, men and women, blacks, whites, Hispanics, Native Americans, Pagans, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Brights, Free Thinkers, etc. are an unstoppable force for good if we stick together. If we let them divide us, as they have been, they stay in control.

We have to get beyond our differences and work together. Solidarity is everything when you're opposing a fascist regime, and that is exactly what we are doing.

 
At 5:15 AM, Blogger Pseudo-Adrienne said...

I am a proud pro-choice, atheist feminist, and pro-secular-government advocate. I don't care if people have faith in a deity or deities, or not--so long as they don't impose that on me I don't care. So I'm not anti-religion/spirituality because I don't care what people do in their private lives, places of worship, or private schools (so long as they aren't funded by the general public's tax dollars). And any theological belief system or lack thereof is afterall a personal matter. Well, it should be a personal matter, though the Radical Rightwing is trying to make it mandatory public policy that everyone believes in and practices their hate-mongering, belligerent, misogynist, homophobic, rascist, anti-Bill-of-Rights Christofascist dogma.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home